One of the
more controversial aspects of faculty unionization is the requirement that all
members of the campus bargaining unit will have to pay “fair share” dues to the
union whether they want to or not.
Here is
what the CFA is telling people (emphasis added):
Illinois
law holds that even faculty who are not members of the union benefit from the
union’s presence. Therefore, non-members must
pay what is called “fair share” dues which are a percentage of what is paid by
union members.
Here is
what state labor law actually says (emphasis added):
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1177&ChapterID=19
(115 ILCS 5/11) (from Ch. 48, par. 1711) Sec. 11.
Non-member fair share payments. When a collective bargaining agreement is entered into with an exclusive representative, it may include a provision requiring employees covered by the agreement who are not members of the organization to pay to the organization a fair share fee for services rendered.
(115 ILCS 5/11) (from Ch. 48, par. 1711) Sec. 11.
Non-member fair share payments. When a collective bargaining agreement is entered into with an exclusive representative, it may include a provision requiring employees covered by the agreement who are not members of the organization to pay to the organization a fair share fee for services rendered.
The point
is clear: “may” is not “must.” The union is not
required to charge fair share dues. They
want to do so because this vastly increases the revenue they collect each year
from faculty, and then will share with their state and national union partners.
(This also
helps to explain why these state and national unions have invested their own
staff and resources in the local union campaign.)
We believe that any decision to require fair share dues should be made in way that includes all affected faculty.
*** This blog
is a jointly authored project by two people who believe that the campaign for
tenure-track faculty unionization has damaged morale and divided our campus,
and that a faculty union, if ever established, would erode academic quality and
undermine our highly successful system of campus shared governance, which has
earned nationwide praise.
We speak for
ourselves. We have no organization behind us, we don’t ask for funding, we don’t
pay national hired guns to come in and make the case for us.
We want to
start a different campus conversation about faculty unionization, which we
believe will be more thoughtful and substantive when people have all the facts.
We
welcome and will consider postings from others expressing issues and concerns about
faculty unionization. We know that many faculty are very upset about the
possibility of working on a unionized campus.
If you see
any information here that is inaccurate, please tell us and we will correct it.
If you share
our concerns and want to help, please forward these postings to your friends
and colleagues, and urge them to do the same. ***