On April
26, when the approved UIC faculty union contracts were finally released, the
CFA promised “summaries of the UIC contracts with comment later today.”
Though they had some immediate positive things to say about the non-tenure track faculty contract, we
heard nothing from them about the tenure-track contract.
This silence is hardly surprising, since a simple comparison between what the union has secured for faculty at UIC, and what has been achieved on this campus without a union, is not very helpful for their case.
This silence is hardly surprising, since a simple comparison between what the union has secured for faculty at UIC, and what has been achieved on this campus without a union, is not very helpful for their case.
First, the
UIC contract provides back pay for
faculty during the two years that negotiations dragged on: 2.5% for 2012-13,
and 3.25% for 2013-14, with an additional 1% for compression and equity raises
(total: 6.75% over two years). During this same two-year period, faculty on
this campus received 4.3% and 4.16% increases, a total of almost 8.5%, paid in full
and on time in the normal salary cycle. (In fact, the UIC union used Urbana’s
higher salaries as the benchmark for their salary demands.)
Salaries
for next year have not been set and were not addressed in this contract, so no
comparison is possible. Nor have dues levels been settled yet – but everyone
should remember that any salary increases need to be offset by dues payments
that are deducted directly from people’s paychecks. Hence, the net salary
increases at UIC are even further behind what faculty, without paying dues,
have received here.
Second, the
threshold for promotion bonuses at UIC is set at 10% of salary. On this campus
they are set at $7000 for promotion to Associate and $10,000 for promotion to
Full, in addition to whatever raises faculty receive from their departments.
Last year the average promotion bonus for faculty on this campus was over 14%.
Third, the
UIC contract offers a “one-time, non-recurring reimbursement” of up to $1500
for research or professional development. On the Urbana campus, thanks to the Humanities
and Arts Scholar Support program, faculty in those units received $1,000 for
such purposes annually between 2008 and 2013, when the amount was raised to $1500.
These funds recur every year. Many faculty receive more than this in research
support from their departments, and all faculty have access to additional
support from the Research Board.
Fourth,
despite claims by the union that faculty governance needs “strengthening,” the
contract leaves all statutory and existing governance structures in place: “Neither
the University nor the Union intend that any of the terms of this Agreement
abridge or diminish the roles of the faculty or the University as established
in University Statutes . . . The parties to this Agreement recognize and
support the role of the Faculty Senate as established by the University of
Illinois Statutes.” We are encouraged by this recognition that shared
governance is an effective and independent mechanism to express the voices and
interests of the faculty, fully outside the control of the union.
Fifth, we
note that a provision was included in the contract that would allow the union
to collect “fair share dues” from faculty who are not members of the union, but
only if more than half the faculty are fully dues-paying members. This is a
fair and reasonable provision, since the moral justification for collecting
fair share dues from everyone rests on the will of a democratic majority having
committed themselves to the union.
This is
the same provision, however, that was condemned by the union during negotiations
as a “Scott Walker proposal” that was “anti-union, plain and simple.”
Similarly, when we raised questions about possible fair share dues on this
campus, the two of us were condemned by CFA members not only as “anti-union,”
but as “right-to-work” shills in the service of the Koch Brothers. It is
somewhat gratifying, therefore, to see that this particular “anti-union”
provision was endorsed by 98% of the voting membership of the UIC union.
Finally,
the contract outlines a grievance procedure that is no stronger in its
protections for tenure-track faculty than the current provisions already in the
Statutes, with the exception that it puts the final level of review in the
hands of an outside arbitrator, not in the faculty or administrators of the
campus. We leave it to you to judge whether that is a superior system.
The
silence of local faculty union advocates on all these provisions is deafening.
The achievements
of faculty and administrators working together on this campus to improve the
compensation and working conditions for faculty have been produced without a
union, without charging faculty dues, without strikes and strike threats, and
without the kind of animosity evidenced by the UIC negotiations.
UPDATE: After we posted this, and after an editorial in the News Gazette, the CFA finally posted some comments on the UIC contracts. They do not address the comparative issues we raised, and they mostly focus on gains for non-tenure track faculty. But we can’t say they are “silent” any more.
***This blog is a jointly authored project by two people who believe that the campaign for tenure-track faculty unionization has damaged morale and divided our campus, and that a faculty union, if ever established, would erode academic quality and undermine our highly successful system of campus shared governance, which has earned nationwide praise.
We speak for ourselves. We have no organization behind us, we don’t ask for funding, we don’t pay national hired guns to come in and make the case for us.
We want to start a different campus conversation about faculty unionization, which we believe will be more thoughtful and substantive when people have all the facts.
We welcome and will consider postings from others expressing issues and concerns about faculty unionization. We know that many faculty are very upset about the possibility of working on a unionized campus.
If you see any information here that is inaccurate, please tell us and we will correct it.
If you share our concerns and want to help, please forward these postings to your friends and colleagues, and urge them to do the same.***
UPDATE: After we posted this, and after an editorial in the News Gazette, the CFA finally posted some comments on the UIC contracts. They do not address the comparative issues we raised, and they mostly focus on gains for non-tenure track faculty. But we can’t say they are “silent” any more.
***This blog is a jointly authored project by two people who believe that the campaign for tenure-track faculty unionization has damaged morale and divided our campus, and that a faculty union, if ever established, would erode academic quality and undermine our highly successful system of campus shared governance, which has earned nationwide praise.
We speak for ourselves. We have no organization behind us, we don’t ask for funding, we don’t pay national hired guns to come in and make the case for us.
We want to start a different campus conversation about faculty unionization, which we believe will be more thoughtful and substantive when people have all the facts.
We welcome and will consider postings from others expressing issues and concerns about faculty unionization. We know that many faculty are very upset about the possibility of working on a unionized campus.
If you see any information here that is inaccurate, please tell us and we will correct it.
If you share our concerns and want to help, please forward these postings to your friends and colleagues, and urge them to do the same.***